Judgements

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the wife and had assisted in obtaining a decree of mutual consent

Mr Rahul Jagannathan had appeared for the petitioners and had contended that registration of the marriage would not be compulsory

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the Complainant and had argued that the promoter had acted in complete

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the lead petitioners in the case and had taken the court through

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the bonafide purchaser/owner of the property and had argued that the writ

Mr Rahul Jagannathan had argued that the husband/accused had provided false information in his affidavit of assets/liabilities statement and persuaded

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear on behalf of the wife and had argued that video conferencing can be

Mr Rahul Jagannathan appeared for the respondent/wife and contended that an application for cancellation of interim maintenance/maintenance cannot be allowed

Mr Rahul Jagannathan had argued before TN-RERA that the promoter had acted in complete contravention to the RERA Act,2016 which

Mr Rahul Jagannathan had appeared on behalf of the petitioner/wife and had argued that the solemnisation of marriage was not