Mr Rahul Jagannathan had appeared on behalf of the petitioner/wife and had argued that the solemnisation of marriage was not in accordance with section 5(1) of The Hindu Marriage Act,1955. It was contended that the first marriage solemnised was not dissolved by a court of competent jurisdiction. After much deliberation, the Hon’ble court had declared the marriage as “null & void”

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear before TN-RERA and had argued that the sanction of loan against the allottees property by REPCO bank in favour of the promoter was ex-facie illegal and without any legal backing.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan had represented the husband before the trial court to conduct the trial & advance oral arguments.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for a local resident from besant nagar, chennai, Tamilnadu and had argued that the street food vendors were illegally conducting their business without any approval or permit and in complete contravention with the local laws.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the victim child X represented by her natural guardian and mother before the hon’ble madras high court. After much persuasion from Mr Rahul; The hon’ble court has held that the accused has no locus standi/right to file or seek for further investigation in a criminal case and has reversed the judgement of the Hon’ble POCSO court.