Judgements

image

Trial Court directs the defendant to pay a sum of Rs 7,00,000/- from the date of filing the suit @ 12% interest per annum along with an additional interest of 6% till the date of realisation.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the plaintiff towards recovery of money which was paid by our client to the defendant/promoter towards lease of a property. Read More
image

Family Court, Chennai dissolves marriage under the grounds of cruelty and grants divorce in favour of the husband

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the petitioner/husband in December 2022 and had successfully obtained a decree of divorce in favour of the husband. Read More
image

TN-RERA Directs Alliance Promoters to act in accordance with the construction agreement

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the allottees/complainant in the successful complaint before TN-RERA Read More
image

Madras High Court re-iterates the scope of review

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear on behalf of the contesting respondent who had succeeded in the civil suit and had argued in length with regards to the scope…
image

In a Significant Decision, Supreme Court grants relief to wife reversing the judgement of the Madras High Court and grants Rs 1,75,000/- towards monthly maintenance to the wife

Ms Shristi Borthakur & Mr Rahul Jagannathan appeared for the wife and had argued that the Madras High Court over-ruled the judgement of the family court without assigning any cogent…
image

Family Court grants divorce under the grounds of Mutual consent

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the wife and had assisted in obtaining a decree of mutual consent divorce in under 3 weeks. Read More
image

In a significant decision the Hon’ble Madras High Court has held that registration of marriage under the Christian Marriage Act, 1872 is not mandatory

Mr Rahul Jagannathan had appeared for the petitioners and had contended that registration of the marriage would not be compulsory as per Section 77 of the Christian Marriage Act, 1872.…
image

TN-RERA imposes a penalty of Rs 3,00,000/- to be paid be M/s Ozone Projects Pvt Ltd and further directs the promoter to handover possession of the apartment to the complainant.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the Complainant and had argued that the promoter had acted in complete contravention to the RERA Act,2016. Accepting the said contention, TN-RERA…
image

In a Significant Decision the Hon’ble Madras High Court has framed guidelines and directed the family court not to insist on the physical appearance of parties.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the lead petitioners in the case and had taken the court through the family court act, 1984, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023…
  • Contact Us

    Contact Form