|
Category
|
Hindu Law
|
Christian Law
|
Parsi Law
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Relevant Provisions | Section 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (“HMA”). | Sections 36 to 38 of the Divorce Act, 1869 (“DA”). | Section 39 to 41 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 (“PMDA”). |
| Interim Maintenance (Maintenance pendente lite) |
Under Section 24, both a husband and a wife having no independent income to support themselves, can apply to the Court for interim maintenance3. The Court can direct the respondent to bear the expenses of the proceedings and provide such monthly sums to the applicant, as it deems fit, during the course of the proceedings. |
Under Section 36, a Christian wife can claim interim maintenance. The Court can direct the husband to bear the expenses of the proceedings and provide such alimony pending the suit as it deems just. |
Under Section 39 the Court can grant interim maintenance to a husband or a wife having no independent income to support themselves. The Court can direct the respondent to bear the expenses of the proceedings and provide such weekly or monthly sums to the applicant, as it deems fit, during the course of the proceedings. |
| Permanent Maintenance | Under Section 25, the Court can pass an order, at time of passing a decree in any proceeding commenced under the HMA or at any time subsequent thereto, granting permanent maintenance to a husband or a wife for his or her support on an application being made by him or her. Such permanent maintenance can be in the form of a gross sum or a monthly amount or a periodical amount for a term not exceeding the life of the applicant. |
An order directing the husband to pay permanent maintenance to his wife can be passed by the Court under Section 376. Such permanent maintenance can be in the form of a gross sum, or an annual sum or monthly or weekly sums for any term not exceeding the life of the applicant. |
Under Section 40, the Court can pass an order, at time of passing a decree in any proceeding commenced under the PMDA or at any time subsequent thereto, granting permanent maintenance to a husband or a wife for his or her support on an application being made by him or her8. Such permanent maintenance may be in the form of a gross sum or a monthly amount or a periodical amount for a term not exceeding the life of the applicant. |
| Miscellaneous | Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (“HA&MA”) entitles a Hindu wife to claim maintenance from her husband during her lifetime whilst living separately from her husband. |
Muslim Law:
Earlier, a Muslim woman could claim maintenance only under the Muslim personal law as laid down in the Quran under which a husband was liable to pay maintenance to his wife only during the period of ‘iddat’. However, the Supreme Court has, vide its landmark judgment in the Shah Bano case held that a Muslim woman is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 irrespective of Muslim personal law. In this regard, it is pertinent to note that immediately after the Shah Bano verdict, the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (“MWA“) was enacted whereunder inter alia a Muslim woman is entitled to claim from her husband (i) a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance; (ii) an amount equal to the sum of mahror dower agreed to be paid to her at the time of her marriage or at any time thereafter according to Muslim law; (iii) all the properties given to her before or at the time of marriage or after her marriage by her relatives or friends or her husband or any relatives of the husband or his friends; and (iv) in cases where the divorced woman herself maintains the children born to her before or after her divorce, a reasonable and fair provision and maintenance for a period of two years from the respective dates of birth of such children. Under Section 3 of the MWA, a Muslim husband is obligated to pay maintenance to his divorced wife within the iddat period. This provision has, in the past, been misinterpreted to mean that the husband is legally obligated to maintain his wife only “during” the iddat period. However, the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Daniel Latiffi v. Union of India has clarified that the maintenance payable by the husband to his wife during the iddat period covers the time period beyond the iddat period as well. Further, under the provisions of the MWA a divorced woman who is unable to maintain herself beyond the iddatperiod can also claim maintenance from her relatives and in case she has no relatives, from the State Wakf Board.
Return of articles
The hot issue between husband and wife when they decide to move forward with a contested divorce is the disposal of properties owned by each party. One of the most pressing issues is whether either party can claim properties belonging to them which is in the custody of the opposite party.
Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, talks about the disposal of spousal property in the following words:
“In any proceeding under this Act, the court may make such provisions in the decree as it deems just and proper with respect to any property presented, at or about the time of marriage, which may belong jointly to both the husband and the wife.”

