Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear on behalf of the sole accused and had argued that the averments in the complaint and in the first information report do not prima facie make out a case of rape as alleged by the prosecution. Accepting the said contention, the Hon’ble court was pleased to grant bail to the accused in accordance with law.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear on behalf of the contesting defendants and had argued that the suit was pre-mature, bereft of particulars and based on an assumptions. Further, it was contended that no relief could be sought against our clients owing to the fact that no relief was claimed against them in the main suit. Accepting the contentions put forth by Mr Rahul, the Hon’ble High Court dismissed the said application

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for the victim child X represented by her natural guardian and mother before the hon’ble madras high court. After much persuasion from Mr Rahul; The hon’ble court has held that the accused has no locus standi/right to file or seek for further investigation in a criminal case and has reversed the judgement of the Hon’ble POCSO court.

Mr Rahul Jagannathan was engaged to appear for a local resident from besant nagar, chennai, Tamilnadu and had argued that the street food vendors were illegally conducting their business without any approval or permit and in complete contravention with the local laws.